Hello,
Matthew Raymond has kicked off a discussion at the
new WHAT WG mailinglist titled "Suggestion for a
Specification: XUL Basic".
Matthew writes:
I propose that the WHAT WG work on a specification
for a subset of Mozilla XUL that for the purposes of
this message I will call XUL Basic. XUL Basic will
actually be the combination of two smaller XUL subsets
which I will refer to as "Keymaster" and "Gatekeeper".
=== "KEYMASTER" ===
The first subset, "Keymaster", is designed for use
in tandem with XHTML. The idea is to create a subset
that can be used in a mixed XUL+XHTML environment to
enhance existing XHTML web applications with controls
that don't exist in XHTML 1.0 itself.
Here is the list of elements:
box
hbox
menu
menubar
menuitem
menupopup
menuseparator
tab
tabbox
tabpanel
tabpanels
tabs
vbox
"Keymaster" is intended for inclusion in browsers
and other programs that already support XHTML or
another language with similar features. This subset is
compatible with the existing XUL motors Luxor XUL
Toolkit and Zulu:
http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net/
http://zulu.netspedition.com/zulu/main/overview.shtml
=== "GATEKEEPER" ===
The second subset, "Gatekeeper", is designed to
provide basic support for forms that are similar in
features to those you can currently create using HTML.
This subset allows the creation of simple XUL-based
web applications contained in their own dialogs or
windows.
Here is the list of XUL elements:
button
checkbox
column
columns
description
dialog
hbox
image
label
menuitem
menulist
menupopup
radio
radiogroup
row
rows
separator
spacer
textbox
vbox
window
Nearly the entire "Gatekeeper" XUL subset is
supported by Macromedia's XML2UI (which I believe is
part of Flash MX 2004. See the following page for
details:
http://garland.duramedia.net/pipermail/extendflash_flashguru.co.uk/20040419/000734.html
XML2UI doesn't support description, image or
window. We could theoretically make this part of the
specification optional, but I'm not convinced that
it's necessary. The element menupopup is supported in
the form "menupop". I don't see the point in changing
the name of the tag to save two characters,
personally. Macromedia should be reasonably capable of
updating Flash MX 2004 to meet this potential
specification.
=== XUL BASIC ===
XUL Basic is the combining of the above two
specifications. It allows menus, tabs, dialogs and
every type of control currently supported by HTML, and
it does it all with 32 tags. The two subset approach
allows developers to pick the subset that would be
most advantageous to implement, then go back and add
the other subset when they have the resources.
XUL Basic is intended to be similar to XHTML
Basic. It would serve as a core standard for XUL
support that would be relatively easy to approve
compared to a full specification of Mozilla XUL. Once
approved, other modules could be added to form a more
complete specification of XUL.
=== In Closing... ===
I'm not entirely sure this is in the scope of the
WHAT WG's charter. Let me know if this is not the
case. I felt this idea was important enough to present
on this mailing list, so I went ahead and posted. If
there is a more appropriate venue for this message,
please let me know. Thoughts, comments and
constructive criticism are welcome.
Source:
http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-June/000111.html
What's your take on it? Any comments? Any thoughts?
- Gerald
-------------------
Gerald Bauer
Open XUL Alliance - A Rich Internet For Everyone |
http://xul.sourceforge.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
xul-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
