On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 08:04 +0200, Michael Gloegl wrote: > Well, has anybody done that with XUL yet? I really don't know. I have > not much XUL experience, which I freely admit. But I suspect (like it > always is) that easier usage comes with reduced flexibility, not just > because one is Java and the other XML. So I'd be really interested to > see an Application using things like heavily customized JLists or > JTrees, or one of the other Components that make Swing so complex. I > doubt it would be much easier or understandable than the equivalent > Swing code.
I challenge you to qualify the "reduced flexibilty". In Vexi, and I'm sure many other XUL-like motors, widgets can be dynamically created and manpilulated. And you can specify widgets just like you would HTML, making it incredibly easy to get into. Programming with Swing was like hell on earth for programmers. Programming in Vexi (and I'm sure other XUL-like motors) is fun. -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Online @ www.charlietech.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
