Mozilla.org claims that XUL IS a trademark : http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/licensing.html
In that case, use of XUL as a generic term is clearly a violation of trademark.
And i confirm : the use of XUL term for other technologies than Mozilla's XML user interface language, cause confusion for newbies who discover http://xul.sourceforge.net site... Some xulfr.org users wrote it to me by email...
Yeah, when I was developing my XUL Basic suggestion for the WHAT WG mailing list, I personally had a hard time finding info on software that supported subsets of XUL because of its misuse. It was rather irritating.
Well, why don't we use XML-UIL ? ;-)
Great! We could call it XUIL for short! ;)
How about Extensible Markup Application Interface Language?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
xul-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
