Hello Wednus Shin, Thanks for sharing your insightful opinion.
> If I'm wrong, please help me to corrent. > Is he saying that topic related to 'Mozilla XUL' is > too specific for > the maillist , at the same time he is saying 'XUL' > can be used as > general term? > Above all, since the mailinglist deals with general > 'XUL', why can't > one start a discussion about specific "Mozilla's > XUL" by the way? > > It's like a professor of Aerospace dept. saying to a > student that: > "We are focusing on the airplanes in various forms > in this class. So > if you want to talk about F-117, I suggest, you have > to get out of > here." You are of course more than welcome to discuss Mozilla's XUL on the xul-talk mailinglist. All I was saying is that the nature of xul-talk will be reflected in the answers, that is, the answers will not only focus on Mozilla's XUL but also include thoughts and comments about alternative XUL offerings. Again to clarify: If you think that Mozilla's XUL is the one and only XUL and you don't want to hear about any alternatives than you better post your questions to the Mozilla XUL Developers group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mozilla-xul - Gerald ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
