On Mon, 02 Okt 2000, you wrote: > Actually, one of my original requirements was that the language be completely > independent of a model (SAX or DOM), it should be up to the implementor what the > underlying traversal model is. We'll be using a compressed DOM, which will be > necessary, partly because it will be a lot faster than having a fully > graphed/parsed DOM (which will get heavy really quickly), and also because our > logic layer will be exposed via the DOM. Defining a logic layer that is exposed > via callbacks wouldn't be intuitive for most application developers, and so we'd > rather avoid it. > > In either case, I still think the choice of DOM or SAX should be left to the > underlying implementation, and should not be part of the specification itself.
It was my general opinion about SAX vs. DOM. In fact this choice depends on your current application design. But anyway, these implementation specific thing should be left off the XUpdate specification. Lars -- ___________________________________________________________________ Lars Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact adminstrator: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read archived messages: http://www.xmldb.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------
