Hi Torbjörn, On Die, 10 Okt 2000, you wrote: > I agree that standards must be set. I would be happy to participate in this > work.
This would be great. Any help is really appreciated. So please join the XUpdate mailing list and you might be interested to review the list archives at http://archive.xmldb.org > My first thought is: Must something be developed? We already have powerful > tools in XSLT. Perhaps an xsl-transform with default rule: > <xsl:template match="* | @* | text() | comment() etc.."> > <xsl:copy> > <xsl:apply-templates select="* | @* | text() | comment() etc.."/> > </xsl:copy> > </xsl:template> > can be usable as an update language? It probably has everything we need and > is an existing standard that should be familiar to anyone working with xml. > As an aside, perhaps full XSL is a good query-language, allowing great > flexibility of choice in formatting the output of a query (The default rule > when querying would of course be to just apply templates of all sub-units > without giving output). You are right, XSLT is a wonderfull approach but consider the following facts: 1. XSLT is separated between an input document and an output document so it would be very hard to "implement" a sequence of update commands which operates on results of previous operations 2. XSLT is not a very intuitive and descriptive update language like SQL I'll CC this mail to the XUpdate mailing list because your questions are related to this mailing list. Regards, Lars -- ___________________________________________________________________ Lars Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact adminstrator: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read archived messages: http://www.xmldb.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------