On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:22:01 +0100 "Jeroen Breedveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | -----Original Message----- > | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars Martin > | Sent: woensdag 21 november 2001 21:39 > | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Subject: Lexus with other XPath implementation > | > | > | Hi Jeroen and all ... > | > | The current Lexus distribution already supports an alternative XPath > | implementation. As written in my previous mail we developed a common > | interface (factory pattern) that uses Xalan as default but not as the > | only possible XPath implementation. Simply implement the interfaces > | under org.infozone.tools.xml.queries.XPath and related and set the > | necessary property to select your "own" XPath implementation. This > | is exactly the same usage known from JAXP complient XML parsers. > | That�s all.... > > Hi, Lars > > You were totally right, I guess I must have been blind because the solution > with the factories is written quite elegantly! > I wrote the implementing classes for our situation and got lexus working > today. You got Lexus working for X-Hive/DB? That would be absolutely fantastic! :-) So what are your experiences? How difficult was it to implement the interfaces for your XPath implementation? Regards, Lars. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Lars Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
