> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Ronald Bourret > Sent: woensdag 20 november 2002 22:52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Namespace issue > > > I agree with you. The prefixes in the XUpdate document should > be handled > separately from the prefixes in the target document. Matching should > only be done on the URI/local name pair.
Ok, so this has to be corrected. I looked at some old emails in this maillinglist about namespace issues and it turned out the most of the code to solve this present namespace issue is already there! For the integration with Xindice prefix-namespaceuri pairs from the xupdate document are stored and apparantly only used by Xindice. Why the conclusion was raised that these pairs were unnecessary for Lexus itself I do not know. The working draft states nothing about how to a specifiy namespace uri. In the uses case I did this: <xupdate:insert-after xmlns:addressX="http://www.xmldb.org/address2"; select="/addresses/addressX:address"> <address name="Jan"> <town>Las Vegas</town> </address> </xupdate:insert-after> I this a logical thing to do? Does it conform for example with what XSLT does? Can anyone think of another way? What are the consequences for the DTD? Is validation (still?) a possibility? Any thoughts? greetings, Jeroen Breedveld -- X-Hive Corporation e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +31 10 7108622 http://www.x-hive.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
