Chris Ridd wrote: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> The root and /usr pages were merged into a single package for IPS >> for most packages in Solaris, since IPS doesn't need to keep them >> seperate for zones/diskless support as SVR4 packages did, so the >> IPS NVDAgraphics includes the contents of both the NVDAgraphicsr >> and NVDAgraphics SVR4 packages. >> > > Is there anything straightforward (ie included in IPS somewhere :-) that > I can run to give some performance figures before and after the > NVDAgraphics downgrade? > > Your original complaint was moving windows around showed the underneath windows repainting very slowly. X11 performance tests may not show the same problem (and are run for every driver release). The best test is to see if the desktop behavior changes.
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_91? Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_91? Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_91? Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_9... Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in s... Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_91? John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_91? Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in snv_9... Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance in s... Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance... Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 performance... John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 perform... Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... Chris Ridd
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... John Martin
- [xwin-discuss] Poor X11 per... Chris Ridd