So I've already had my internal stab at this, and it looks better, IMHO, but a couple more comments ...
> data/autoconf/ > xorg-autoconf-macros What's in here? (And if you say "autoconf macros", I'm walkin' downstairs and kickin' your ass.) Would other packages depend on this in any way? Are they generic to xorg, or do they include bits that are specific to particular components? I think having "autoconf" in two places is redundant. How about data/autoconf/xorg? > documentation/ > xorg-docs [docs unaffiliated with specific software packages, > mostly the contents of /usr/X11/share/man5 ] Similar comment about duplication here: "documentation/xorg"? Or "docs/xorg"? Danek
