Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Cool - though I doubt we'll ever see a SPARC machine with Intel graphics
>> on the motherboard, I understand that's the only DRM module we actually
>> have checked into ON right now. 
> 
> It was meant to be an interim step in getting mach64, r128, radeon and 
> ffb DRM kernel level support working, as described.

Right - makes sense to start with what we already have working on Solaris.

> Besides: (At least few of) those Intel chipsets are not exclusively 
> shipped on-board.

I don't think any of the ones supported by the i915 DRM were - only ones
much older than that.    But as we've both agreed, it's when we get a more
complete set of DRM modules, like the ATI ones, on SPARC that it really
gets interesting.   One step at a time there.

> It is only. that the SB1500/2500 and U25/U45 ' s pci bridges are not yet 
> supported by Xorg's bus scanning. As those 4 systems are totally 
> unsupported by the Linux or BSD kernels (and OpenSolaris' PCI code for 
> them is still closed source) it is practically impossible to extend 
> sparcPci.c to make it work on them.

I believe Jay is planning on helping there once you finish your merge,
but no matter how much I poke him, he doesn't pipe up...

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
         Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering

Reply via email to