Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> While this case seems to dance around some of the possible "rules" 
> about EOFs, possibly violating certain Solaris policies, I believe 
> that the project team has taken all reasonable precautions to ensure 
> that the EOF is unlikely to actually affect anyone.
>
> Therefore I happily give it a +1.   Henceforth, let the dead code be 
> removed! :-)
>
  I wish it didn't, but openjdk requires libXp.  Not sure if it matters.

Reply via email to