Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>   
>> Certainly, last week I saw your comments in the pkgdefs.
>> However, binary compatibility seems to be broken. I experimented with 
>> LD_PRELOAD'ing Sun's version of libXaw, lofs-mounting one version over 
>> the other and vice versa, etc.
>>     
>
> Plus I have compared them using misc. binutils.
>   

Okay, good. The incompatibility issues seem to be upward-related (which 
is no wonder). Downward compatibility seems to work sufficiently well. 
Solaris Express or Solaris 10 may be a different pair of shoes. But at 
least for FOX we should make the new libXaw public, and either have 
SUNWxorg-cfg create symlinks from the public to the private locations 
(at least in the interim, until more thorough tests have been 
completed), and then, finally, have xorgcfg link against the then public 
version of Xorg's libXaw. Plus remove the legacy compatibility links to 
Sun's old version / to ../openwin/lib from SUNWxwrtl:

SUNWxwrtl/prototype_com:86:s none lib/libXaw.so=./libXaw.so.5
SUNWxwrtl/prototype_com:87:s none lib/libXaw.so.4=../openwin/lib/libXaw.so.4
SUNWxwrtl/prototype_com:88:s none lib/libXaw.so.5=../openwin/lib/libXaw.so.5
SUNWxwrtl/prototype_com:208:s none lib/$plat_64/libXaw.so=./libXaw.so.5
SUNWxwrtl/prototype_com:209:s none 
lib/$plat_64/libXaw.so.5=../../openwin/lib/64/libXaw.so.5


%m

Reply via email to