On 5 May 2015 at 21:31, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/posix-timers.h b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> > index 907f3fd..35786c5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> > @@ -98,9 +98,13 @@ struct k_itimer {
> >
> >  struct k_clock {
> >       int (*clock_getres) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec
> *tp);
> > +     int (*clock_getres64) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct
> timespec64 *tp);
> >       int (*clock_set) (const clockid_t which_clock,
> >                         const struct timespec *tp);
> > +     int (*clock_set64) (const clockid_t which_clock,
> > +                         const struct timespec64 *tp);
> >       int (*clock_get) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *
> tp);
> > +     int (*clock_get64) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec64
> *tp);
> >       int (*clock_adj) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timex *tx);
> >       int (*timer_create) (struct k_itimer *timer);
> >       int (*nsleep) (const clockid_t which_clock, int flags,
> > @@ -109,10 +113,15 @@ struct k_clock {
> >       int (*timer_set) (struct k_itimer * timr, int flags,
> >                         struct itimerspec * new_setting,
> >                         struct itimerspec * old_setting);
> > +     int (*timer_set64) (struct k_itimer *timr, int flags,
> > +                         struct itimerspec64 *new_setting,
> > +                         struct itimerspec64 *old_setting);
> >       int (*timer_del) (struct k_itimer * timr);
> >  #define TIMER_RETRY 1
> >       void (*timer_get) (struct k_itimer * timr,
> >                          struct itimerspec * cur_setting);
> > +     void (*timer_get64) (struct k_itimer *timr,
> > +                          struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting);
>
> I asked you last time to provide a conversion for a single instance
> first and I gave you even step by step instructions.
>
> But you insist on resending the whole mess in one go. Try again.
>
> Thanks,
>
>         tglx
>

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your comments. I think i have followed your instructions
to convert the syscall functions in patch 5 and patch 6.

And i have confusions about the "a single instance first", could you
explain that in detail? Thanks a lot.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
_______________________________________________
Y2038 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038

Reply via email to