On 12 May 2015 at 23:33, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 22:07:53 Baolin Wang wrote: > > } > > > > +static void default_timer_get64(struct k_itimer *timr, > > + struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting64) > > +{ > > + struct itimerspec cur_setting; > > + struct k_clock *kc = clockid_to_kclock(timr->it_clock); > > + > > + kc->timer_get(timr, &cur_setting); > > + *cur_setting64 = itimerspec_to_itimerspec64(&cur_setting); > > +} > > + > > > > The new version is correct, but when I asked you in private to send the > update, > what I meant was a reply to my email, and only the updated function for the > sake of discussion. You have now sent the patch as a new thread, which > means > we have two email conversations with the same subject line and different > contents, which is rather confusing and should be avoided. > > Arnd >
Sorry to cause the confusion. Cause i reorder the patch, and i'll avoid this situation in the future. Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards _______________________________________________ Y2038 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
