On 3 June 2015 at 03:19, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote: > > Subject line is horrible again. > > "timekeeping: Introduce current_kernel_time64()" > > Is precise and sufficient. > > > This patch adds current_kernel_time64() function with timespec64 type, > > and makes current_kernel_time() 'static inline' and moves it to > timekeeping.h > > file. > > Again, you describe WHAT the patch is doing first and clutter the > changelog with completely irrelevant information. > > > It is convenient for user to get the current kernel time with timespec64 > type, > > What's conveniant about it? > > > and delete the current_kernel_time() function easily in timekeeping.h > file. That > > is ready for 2038 when get the current time. > > This makes no sense at all. > > Again you should describe WHY current_kernel_time() must be replaced. > > Thanks, > > tglx >
Ok, i'll add the description why should do the change and conversion. Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards _______________________________________________ Y2038 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
