Hi, John

On 07/09/2015 04:09 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Bamvor Zhang Jian
<bamvor.zhangj...@linaro.org> wrote:
+int get_timeval64(struct timeval64 *tv,
+                  const struct __kernel_timeval __user *utv)
+{
+       struct __kernel_timeval ktv;
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = copy_from_user(&ktv, utv, sizeof(ktv));
+       if (ret)
+               return -EFAULT;
+
+       tv->tv_sec = ktv.tv_sec;
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+          || is_compat_task()
+#endif

These sorts of ifdefs are to be avoided inside of functions.

Instead, it seems is_compat_task() should be defined to 0 in the
!CONFIG_COMPAT case, so you can avoid the ifdefs and the compiler can
still optimize it out.
I add this ifdef because I got compile failure on arm platform. This
file do not include the <linux/compat.h> directly. And in arm64,
compat.h is included implicitily.
So, I am not sure what I should do here. Include <linux/compat.h> in
this file directly or add a this check at the beginning of this file?

#ifndef is_compat_task
#define is_compat_task() (0)
#endif

Otherwise this looks similar to a patch Baolin (cc'ed) has been working on.
Yes.

regards

bamvor

thanks
-john

_______________________________________________
Y2038 mailing list
Y2038@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038

Reply via email to