On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Jens Wiklander
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The two do the same thing, but we want to have a consistent
>> naming in the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
>> index 41aea12e2bcc..b45c73dd37a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_get_time(struct
>> optee_msg_arg *arg)
>> OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT)
>> goto bad;
>>
>> - getnstimeofday64(&ts);
>> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
>> arg->params[0].u.value.a = ts.tv_sec;
>> arg->params[0].u.value.b = ts.tv_nsec;
>>
>> --
>> 2.9.0
>>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Jens Wiklander <[email protected]>
Thanks for the review. Can you pick it up in your tree?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Y2038 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
