The ohci driver uses the get_seconds() function to implement the 32-bit
CSR_BUS_TIME register. This was added in 2010 commit a48777e03ad5
("firewire: add CSR BUS_TIME support").

As get_seconds() returns a 32-bit value (on 32-bit architectures), it
seems like a good fit for that register, but it is also deprecated because
of the y2038/y2106 overflow problem, and should be replaced throughout
the kernel with either ktime_get_real_seconds() or ktime_get_seconds().

I'm using the latter here, which uses monotonic time. This has the
advantage of behaving better during concurrent settimeofday() updates
or leap second adjustments and won't overflow a 32-bit integer, but
the downside of using CLOCK_MONOTONIC instead of CLOCK_REALTIME is
that the observed values are not related to external clocks.

If we instead need UTC but can live with clock jumps or overflows,
then we should use ktime_get_real_seconds() instead, retaining the
existing behavior.

Reviewed-by: Clemens Ladisch <clem...@ladisch.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
I notice that Stefan Richter has not been active on the mailing lists
since February 2018.

Andrew, could you pick it up in the meantime?
---
 drivers/firewire/ohci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firewire/ohci.c b/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
index 45c048751f3b..5125841ea338 100644
--- a/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ static u32 update_bus_time(struct fw_ohci *ohci)
 
        if (unlikely(!ohci->bus_time_running)) {
                reg_write(ohci, OHCI1394_IntMaskSet, OHCI1394_cycle64Seconds);
-               ohci->bus_time = (lower_32_bits(get_seconds()) & ~0x7f) |
+               ohci->bus_time = (lower_32_bits(ktime_get_seconds()) & ~0x7f) |
                                 (cycle_time_seconds & 0x40);
                ohci->bus_time_running = true;
        }
-- 
2.9.0

_______________________________________________
Y2038 mailing list
Y2038@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038

Reply via email to