> just for curiosity, why you decide to not assign kn and ks in > Ip2_CpmMat_CpmMat_CpmPhys? Any particular reason? I am actually not using those stiffnesses, but they are assigned for compatibility (for post-processing, for instance) in Law2_Dem3DofGeom_CpmPhys_Cpm, along with crossSection.
The reason is (and it is a design issue of yade, but I see no really good solution) that Ip2_* functors shouldn't access intrGeom, so I postpone that to the law functor if called for the first time. The model itself is formulated in terms of strains and stresses (rather than displacements and forces), so I use E and G for moduli. I hope it is clearer, but I might be writing nonsense at this time of the day. Cheers, Vaclav _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
