> I don't know if it is useless. I feel like you have your head in your > thesis now, with applications to concretes, and one specific theoretical > background in mind (namely Hentz).
The most disturbing thing for me is that Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_FrictPhys and Ip2_CpmMat_CpmMat_CpmPhys and their related constitutive laws give different results even pure elastic behavior... (since their rigidities will be different) It would be better to have this thing the same everywhere, it is really just question of convention; OTOH I don't feel like changing that in the cpm code, since there is already bucnh of scripts that have Material::young calibrated to get desired E* corresponding to some concrete. Some of the argument are likely my secondary rationalization (though not necessarily persuasive); for me, they are still valid on the feeling side, although rationally they are not stronger than yours. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
