> Last remark : using v' as defined above, and not just "v" in the damping > equation, can't probably be found in any paper. > I introduced that after some tests in 1D, and found that it was better > for high values of the timestep. More precisely, for cases where the > sign of the velocity is reverted at each time-step, so you can't really > tell if the force is opposed to it or not if you don't define (F,V) for > the exact same time. I am not able to download fulltexts from aip.org from either Prague or Grenoble networks... can you send me a copy? (Holy s**t, this whole publication permissions are insane...)
I think the motivation for v' was clear, it is estimator for on-step velocity (which never appears in leapfrog). BTW1 I added the possibility of putting bibtex references to docs, as well as $expr$ for inline math (which is replaced by :math:`expr` in the process), so I hope documentation picks up. BTW2 Is Jean-Francois' thesis available? It should be part of publications section on the wiki. I am sure there was more articles published recently and there is almost nothing there. Could people somehow update it, for themselves, putting PDF on the wiki itself if possible? Cheers, v. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
