On 4 June 2010 13:09, Jerome Duriez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello (Chiara and Bruno ?) > > I focused on this initalKn defined in FrictPhys. The last mails on this > topic ( > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02619.html for > example) confirm my feeling that it is actually useless. But Bruno suggested > to Chiara maybe to use it. It is currently not the case in current trunk > (and an already existing "kn0" in HertzMindlin lets me think that it will > never be ?) > So, the question is : > > Is there objections that I remove this variable initialKn (and initialKs ?) > from the code ? (I'll pay attention to do this without breaking anything !!) > For me no objection, I think they are no more useful as I preferred a total formulation for HM. I do not know if they might serve for other purposes as it was not me to introduce them. Let's wait Bruno's answer. cheers, Chiara > > Jerome > > -- > Jérôme Duriez > ATER Iut 1 Grenoble, département GMP - Laboratoire 3S-R > 04.56.52.86.49 (ne pas laisser de messages sur le répondeur) > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
