Hi Bruno, actually I was going to send you an email about that (nice synchronicity). Is it the same then? Could you be so kind to explain me why? Sorry if I ask, I know it is something we already discussed on the list (see this whole thread http://www.mail-archive.com/yade-us...@lists.launchpad.net/msg01868.html) but have still some doubts on it. Thank you, Chiara
On 12 November 2010 16:48, Chareyre <674...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Chiara, > > If it was updated as you suggest, would there be a use to keep the > homoDeform=1 option? > It would be the same as homoDeform=2 it seems. > > Bruno > > -- > homoDeform=1 does not handle the periodic case correctly. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674000 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine: New > > Bug description: > Currently, in the periodic case, if homoDeform=1 (alias Cundall way) we do > not adjust the values of the relative velocities as according to the > velocity gradient. This should be done, since, in such a case, we only > update particle positions and not particle velocities. > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/674000/+subscribe > -- homoDeform=1 does not handle the periodic case correctly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade developers, which is subscribed to Yade. Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine: New Bug description: Currently, in the periodic case, if homoDeform=1 (alias Cundall way) we do not adjust the values of the relative velocities as according to the velocity gradient. This should be done, since, in such a case, we only update particle positions and not particle velocities. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
