Hi (Jan, Vaclav), If I understand correctly (looking at scripts), Cell::trsf is currently used to define the initial geometry of the period (e.g. applying rotations). Is that correct? I didn't expect this usage when I introduced it, as it was supposed to record cumulated transformations. The annoying thing is that it is impossible to uncouple initial geometry and material transformation in this approach. For instance, it is not possible to have trsf=Zero for initial cells that are not an axis aligned.
My suggestion is to define the initial geometry using Hsize, instead of refSize and trsf (the old behaviour would still be possible). I started implementing that, but before I commit anything, did I overlook something? Bruno -- _______________ Bruno Chareyre Associate Professor ENSE³ - Grenoble INP Lab. 3SR BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21 Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43 ________________ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
