I think, it is OK. See, how was RPM-visualisation implemented [1] (removed now). If it will be done by the same way, I do not see any problems with that.
[1] https://github.com/yade/trunk/commit/c84ef47cfbf6a9b11269d2d27e647d9359363edb Anton 2013/9/20 Jérôme Duriez <[email protected]>: > If I was not clear, I'm currently suggesting to add some code in VTKRecorder > Engine to let output some data regarding JCFPM classes. > So, I was asking > - if such changes in trunk are welcome / desired by other guys dealing with > these classes (so that they have a version corresponding to trunk) ? > - if Luc, especially, agrees that I perform the commit, or plans to do it > himself, since he wrotes the code. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
