Hi Bruno > Why would you define a body with FrictPhys if is supposed to have a > cohesive behavior with others? > You can just give CohFrictPhys to everyone.
That's what I did so far but it is not always possible. > > Any idea about the goReverse? Can it be removed? > > Maybe not removed. I think it is necessary, precisely because we can > have non-symmetric functors. If you swap ids in Ip2 you may break the > work of the Ig2. > The go reverse is here for this reason (handling non-symmetric cases > without forcing a specific ordering of id1/id2 and without the need to > define to functors). The comment in line 98 in IntersectionLoop.cpp says: // arguments for the geom functor are in the reverse order (dispatcher would normally call goReverse). // we don't remember the fact that is reverse, so we swap bodies within the interaction // and can call go in all cases In fact, it seams goReverse is never called because bodies are swapped before. So maybe we can get rid of it??? Klaus _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
