Hi Bruno, sorry for late answer, during Christmas I totally forgot about the topic :-) yes, reading it once more, it sounds contradictory.. but anyway it make sense to me and I am sure there are words that would explain/define it better..
apparently the topic would deserve something like FAQ [1] :-) Jan [1] https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/678055 út 18. 12. 2018 v 20:07 odesílatel Bruno Chareyre < bruno.chare...@3sr-grenoble.fr> napsal: > > > Le mar. 18 déc. 2018 16:37, Jan Stránský <honzik.stran...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> >> >> see my previous (slightly modified): >> - assuming the particles rigid >> - computing the force under assumption that in reality there would be no >> overlap and some deformation. >> > > This is self contradictory, no? What would be a model where you assume the > contrary of what you consider reality and expected result?! > By this statement you are efficiently killing the rigid assumption. > Obviously it doesn't fit in the general picture and it it is useless. > Bruno > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
