> > > but what about simply using rotateAndGetShear, which is already available? > Splitting this function, as it is partially done, it is useful but in cases > in which some operations into the contact law are necessary (like damping). > You said that that function could be used to rotate any vector (in this case > the input would be a total shear displacement vector instead of shear force) > and it will return the increment shear displacement. No need to update code. > It would be only two lines code more (one line to call the function and save > the returned increment, the other to add the obained increment to the total > shear displ vector). > > Don't worry Chiara, what you have done will still be functional. What we discussed today was in relation with memory locality in parallel processing (right? :) ). After changes, the rotate function would be faster, the computation of relative velocity would not. Nothing more.
Bruno
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
