> I have not tried the Cpm model. Because it may not be considered the > cohesion at the re-contact point. It should be fit to the rock type > perfectly. But in my model, the cohesion at the re-contact point must > be implemented.
Just a note on this: CPM and CohesiveFrictional&c models are quite different; no cohesion at re-contact (you _want_ cohesion at re-contact? I would expect the contrary for rock) is really a minor difference compared to other ones, such as the damage model -- CF&c is brittle-failure whereas CPM has softening on the contact-level with cracks closing in compression; I don't know which one is better for rock, but be aware of those other differences. Cheers, v. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
