On 08/22/2013 05:49 PM, Bruno Chareyre wrote: > Hi, > I discussed that with Raphael before and I was not sure it was worth > keeping the existing equations. > One reason is it is listed red here: > https://yade-dem.org/wiki/ConstitutiveLaws (i.e. no user and no > maintainer...)
Oops, it is really working code and I am using it and adding there sometimes new features. > I'm glad to hear that somebody can vouch for the current code and that > it corresponds to a published model (it would be nice to mention it in > the documentation). It is mentioned here [1] in getViscoelasticFromSpheresInteraction, but you are right, it should be added directly into the contact law. I will take care about that. > @Anton, do you recommend "diff" or "git format-patch"? It does not really matter. But, please, do "incremental" commits e.g. one change per commit. It is not a good idea to have one large patch. So, probably, format-patch will be better. [1] https://www.yade-dem.org/doc/yade.utils.html?highlight=getviscoelasticfromspheresinteraction#yade._utils.getViscoelasticFromSpheresInteraction
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
