Question #295531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/295531
Status: Open => Needs information
Jérôme Duriez requested more information:
Hi,
Your issue sounds rather strange to me. The data saved (by
TriaxialStateRecorder() engine) in 'WallStresses' obviously should not
be affected by the contact law used, or the choice of
TriaxialStressController vs TriaxialCompressionEngine as a boundary
controller.
Apart for the (always possible) existence of a weird bug, it may also happen
that your simulation is inconsistently defined when you try to include moment
law in HM or "setCohesionNow" in "Cundall-Strack".
In fact, please be more specific here as "setCohesionNow" is part of the
"CohFrictMat" model (in terms of Ip2_CohFrictMat_CohFrictMat_CohFrictPhys --
Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment) but is not part of the
"CundallStrack" model (in terms of Ip2_FrictMat_FrictMat_FrictPhys --
Law2_ScGeom_FrictPhys_CundallStrack)
In order to help us to look at your issue, a first recommendation would be to
provide us with a minimal working script that is
- minimal (we do not care about VTK things, particle size distribution, and so
on...)
- and working: it will be impossible for anyone to try your script because of
sp.load('sp.txt'), for instance.
;-)
Jerome
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
