Question #657063 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/657063
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
For CU, see #1 by Amiya.
For UU, again, there is nothing to do. Just as textbooks (should) tell you,
conducting UU tests with different confining pressure is pointless because all
tests are exactly the same from the solid phase point of view (i.e. in terms of
effective stress). If you run one CU simulation with confining p=100, giving
q_peak=300 , you can call it UU on a material pre-consolidated at 100.
You can then pretend this very same result q_peak=300 reflects the results of
UU tests with p=200, 300 400,... since there is strictly no difference neither
from theoretical nor computational points of view. I fail to see the point of
such a trick, though.
Conducting UU tests with different confining pressure is pointless, that's it.
Bruno
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
