Question #660585 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/660585
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer: >I don't think the DFNFlow scheme is truly poroelastic No, no, that's fine. We are only speaking of re-meshing here. The volume changes are still calculated as usual because it uses the actual positions/velocities from O.bodies at each iteration, not the coordinates of the triangulated points. In fact what happens now is what you describe in your last paragraph (in #4, using vertices ids). Which stability problem are we speaking about?? >the current method cannot trick facets near a broken bond that does not line up with an edge on the triangulation. True. At the same time, it is very unlikely that two particles close to each other will not share an edge - almost impossible unless you define very large radius for remote interactions (>~2x diameter). > I wonder if we could trick facets by looking for their intersection with a broken bond, A facet is a set of three edges, if there is no edge then there is no facet... or maybe I missed your point. Cheers Bruno -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
