New question #676507 on Yade:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/676507
Hi there
I know that PFC version 6 has the capability of simulating angular rigid
blocks. This is a step forward in being able to model tightly interlocked, low
porosity assemblies and it prepare conditions to study in a more efficient and
robust way. Rigid, convex {polyhedral in 3D; polygonal in 2D} blocks are now
available in PFC 6. We can easily create a zero porosity initial specimen, bond
and cut the material, and allow for failure and flow. I believe that there are
several benefits to the rigid blocks in PFC, including: 1) ability to couple
with FLAC3D, 2) robustness of the contact detection and resolution, 3)
efficiency especially during flow, 4) block rounding, 5) ability to model in 2D
and 3D with nearly the same data files, 6) Python bindings to the rigid block
data structures.
Please compare capabilities of YADE with PFC version 6 in the above cases. Does
YADE software have those abilities and capabilities which I mentioned in
previous paragraph? which one of them is in YADE? what is the disadvantages of
YADE compared to PFC (6)?
The previuos version of PFC (version 5) approach has a key shortcoming which is
the inability to specify very low initial porosities for the choke blasted
blasted ring material due to the spherical or clump shape of the particles.
I wait for your useful comment and analogies
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
