Question #688681 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/688681
Status: Answered => Open
ehsan benabbas is still having a problem:
> why you "should get the same behavior", if you use a different material,
> different Ip2 and different Law2?
I get your point. However, it is not a different material (for me at least).
When we are considering the same specimen, and this specimen is a real subject
in our minds, we should get the same mechanical behavior apart from the
scientific approach we look at the specimen. In fact, the material, the
specimen, and its properties, all are the same, so, just changing the contact
law should not lead to a different mechanical behavior (new stress-strain
curve).
> And if you think/are sure that with certain parameters it leads to the same
> physics, why to change it?
With the FricMat, I get the dens behavior (with peak) which makes sense as the
porosity is 0.4 and grains are in the sphere shape and fully rounded. The
problem with this contact law is the "young" parameter which makes the code to
be run so long as for 3 weeks. However, with the ViscElMat I get only the
hardening behavior which refers to a loose specimen (with cn=cs=0) but the
code will be run only in 15 minutes.
Again, for the FricMat, when I define the "young" based on Kn, it gets a value
which makes the run-time so long.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
