Question #690973 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/690973
Jan Stránský proposed the following answer: > -j32 26.1s > -j48 24.51s > -j90 23.27s \ 23.72s > -j92 23.05s \ 23.76s \ 24.24s \ 24.09s > the -j92 or -j90 maybe the optimal jobs pretty much depending on the definition of "optimal". Compared to -j32, -j90 is just 10% faster, but using almost 3x more CPU power. > -j48 1386.40 iter/s > -j90 1279 iter/s > It seems that -j90 is the best. same as above > It looks that ... in the 3D show are different, > I hope to check if the rotation speed matches the falling speed of particles > or not. The direct way is the 3D show. 3D view is just for rough checks. Use "hard numbers" for serious comparisons (like O.bodies[...].state.vel) > if I close the 3D show, the speed of the plank and particles are the same with 3D show open or not? yes (if you mean the simulation-world speed) > If the speed of plank and particles are not depend on the 3D show. simulation state definitely is not influenced by the 3D view (if it was, it would be a bug). > I will storage the bodies' location of the simulation process, and replay the locations after the simulation is over. I would say this is a standard approach > is there a better way to do that? to do what? (storage the bodies' location, replay after the simulation, after the simulation is over, ...) cheers Jan -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
