On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> wrote: [...] > In the future, we may remove these options entirely. For now, > having too much documentation and tuning options may confuse new > users and minimize the importance/visibility of other options, > so remove documentation for this. > > I'm not convinced user-space buffer size tuning has a place in > an application server written in a high-level language. Heck, > many servers written in C do not have this.
Personally I do like various options even if I won't touch them, since maybe I'll on some day. We could put more advanced options in advanced configuration page to avoid confusion. Or a warning like "Don't touch them unless you really know what you're doing" should be good (scary) enough. However, I don't know if it makes sense to configure client_header_buffer_size and client_max_body_size. (nginx has them, I think?) If not, I guess it's really fine to remove them, and we're free to change them or stop providing those options in the future. That's also good, I guess.
