Public bug reported:
[Existing problem]
In the current QoS implementation, network QoS bandwidth limit are applied to
all the ports uniformly in the network. This may be wrong. Consider a case
where the user just want 20 mbps speed for the entire network but the current
implementation will end up in allowing 20 * num_of_ports_in_the_networks mbps.
[Proposal]
This proposal talks about the support for aggregated bandwidth rate limiting
where all the ports in the network should together attain the specified network
bandwidth limit. To start with an easiest implementation could be dividing the
overall bandwidth value with the number of ports in the network. In this there
might a case of over and under utilization which might need more thought (May
be we got to monitor all the ports and have a notion of thresh hold to decide
whether to increase or decrease the bandwidth)
[Benefits]
Better and correct user experience.
[What is the enhancement?]
Applying correct QoS rule parameter to each ports.
[Related information]
None
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: rfe
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521194
Title:
Qos Aggregated Bandwidth Rate Limiting
Status in neutron:
New
Bug description:
[Existing problem]
In the current QoS implementation, network QoS bandwidth limit are applied to
all the ports uniformly in the network. This may be wrong. Consider a case
where the user just want 20 mbps speed for the entire network but the current
implementation will end up in allowing 20 * num_of_ports_in_the_networks mbps.
[Proposal]
This proposal talks about the support for aggregated bandwidth rate limiting
where all the ports in the network should together attain the specified network
bandwidth limit. To start with an easiest implementation could be dividing the
overall bandwidth value with the number of ports in the network. In this there
might a case of over and under utilization which might need more thought (May
be we got to monitor all the ports and have a notion of thresh hold to decide
whether to increase or decrease the bandwidth)
[Benefits]
Better and correct user experience.
[What is the enhancement?]
Applying correct QoS rule parameter to each ports.
[Related information]
None
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1521194/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
