No, this isn't a regression, it looks like it's been this way since it was introduced in mitaka:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/2ba4644f91aa523c2a14e32a168b853cf0b8c4e1 So we won't hold newton-rc2 for this. ** Tags added: pci ** Changed in: nova Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Also affects: nova/mitaka Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova/newton Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nova/newton Assignee: (unassigned) => Moshe Levi (moshele) ** Changed in: nova/newton Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nova/mitaka Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: nova/newton Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625220 Title: get_function_by_ifname does not return true for physical function Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): Fix Released Status in OpenStack Compute (nova) mitaka series: Confirmed Status in OpenStack Compute (nova) newton series: In Progress Bug description: Due to a missing slash ('/') in the 'get_function_by_ifname' method (pci/utils), an incorrect path was passed to read the number of VFs and determine if the device is a PF or not. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1625220/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
