Letting the user to not specify the segmentation id is perfectly valid.
Here's an example: http://paste.openstack.org/show/592402/. Please see
additional comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410107
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649750
Title:
Cannot create a provider net without segment_id if only config a
physical net name
Status in neutron:
Invalid
Bug description:
Can not create a provider network if just config ml2_vlan_range like
"vlan_net".
cmd1: openstack network segment create net-name --physical-network vlan_net
--network f5cfe320-f5bb-41b1-b39f-ee5c32f8f356 --network-type vlan
cmd2: neutron net-create --provider:physical_network vlan_net
--provider:network_type vlan net-name
All cmds return exception NoNetworkAvailable, this is not frendly, we
should tell users how to use the configured physical network, what
they can do in the next.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1649750/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
