Since there is no top-level consumers resource in the placement API I'm not sure how much internal machinery we want to document in the reference. This came from a comment I had in a nova change that mentioned it - and I'm mostly concerned about nova making assumptions about how the internally undocumented behavior of placement works today but might not work in the future.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591597/5/nova/scheduler/client/report.py@2110 ** Changed in: nova Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: nova Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794138 Title: placement api ref should state that PUT empty allocation will delete the consumer Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): Opinion Bug description: When empty allocations dict is sent in the body of PUT /allocations/{consumer_uuid} the placement deletes the consumer. This should be stated in the API ref. https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement/#update-allocations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1794138/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
