** Changed in: neutron
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664294
Title:
Netlink solution not enough mature for Ocata
Status in neutron:
Fix Released
Bug description:
neutron-fwaas replaced conntrack-tools by netlink + pyroute2[1] in
order to delete faster conntrack entries when the rules associated to
a firewall (through a policy) are updated.
This change highlights many warnings:
1) the code readability should be improved:
** it embeds dead code/unused constants[2]
** it uses non-meaningful variable names[3] ("h", "ct")
** it uses hardcoded values instead of existing constants[3]
** it miss docstrings/comments for tricky parts[2][3]
2) the change tricky part[3] is untested
3) the code seems unhealthy,
** nothing ensures that file descriptors/objects are correctly
closed/destroyed if an exception is raised[3]
** pyroute2.netns.setns use[3] seems not (green)thread-safe. It seems a
(green)thread can move the process in $netns2 when a concurrent greenthread is
"working" in $netns1. It can be solved by a lock.
4) the change should highlight if and why nfct and libc C libraries
used in the change are eventlet-friendly.
5) the change uses pyroute2.netns.setns in [3] which moves the current
process to a specific netns
** it seems that when we enter the netns, the process seems to never go back
in the root netns[9]. Is it an acceptable limitation?
** When the process is in a netns, every network action is done in the netns
including rpc calls, remote sylog which won't work because they should be done
in the root namespace.
1) => we can live on the short term with it (easy to address)
2) => we can address it (costly)
3) => we can address it (easy to solve)
4) => i don't know how to get an answer to this question
5) => it seems to imply that we have to dedicate specific(s) process(es)
moving between netns to list/kill/flush_entries like as it's done in
oslo.rootwrap daemon mode (very costly by required)
These warnings are based on my understanding of the netlink feature, perhaps
i miss something.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/389654
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/common/netlink_constants.py
[3]
https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/privileged/netlink_lib.py
[9] Code used to test pyroute2:
import os, pyroute2, pyroute2.netns
root_ifs = {x.get_attr('IFLA_IFNAME') for x in pyroute2.IPRoute().get_links()}
fd = pyroute2.netns.setns('taz')
ns_ifs = {x.get_attr('IFLA_IFNAME') for x in pyroute2.IPRoute().get_links()}
os.close(fd)
last_ifs = {x.get_attr('IFLA_IFNAME') for x in pyroute2.IPRoute().get_links()}
if root_ifs == ns_ifs:
print 'Add a new interface in root netns with ip tuntap a mode tap'
elif last_ifs == root_ifs:
print 'OK: we ended in root netns'
elif root_ifs != last_ifs == ns_ifs:
print 'KO: we ended in taz netns'
else:
print 'Something is wrong'
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1664294/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
