Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864510 Committed: https://opendev.org/openstack/kolla-ansible/commit/8bf8656dbad3def707eca2d8ddd2c9bfed389b86 Submitter: "Zuul (22348)" Branch: master
commit 8bf8656dbad3def707eca2d8ddd2c9bfed389b86 Author: Bartosz Bezak <[email protected]> Date: Tue Nov 15 11:08:15 2022 +0100 Generate ovn-chassis-mac-mappings on ovn-controller group Previously ovn-chassis-mac-mappings [1] has been added only to ovn-controller-compute group. However external ports are being scheduled on network nodes, therefore we need also do that there. Closes-Bug: 1995078 [1] https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/blob/v22.09.0/controller/ovn-controller.8.xml#L239 Change-Id: Ie62e9220bad56262cad602ca1480e6ca65827819 ** Changed in: kolla-ansible Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995078 Title: OVN: HA chassis group priority is different than gateway chassis priority Status in kolla-ansible: Fix Released Status in kolla-ansible wallaby series: New Status in kolla-ansible xena series: New Status in kolla-ansible yoga series: New Status in kolla-ansible zed series: Fix Released Status in neutron: Confirmed Bug description: OpenStack release affected - Wallaby, Xena and Yoga for sure OVN version: 21.12 (from CentOS NFV SIG repos) Host OS: CentOS Stream 8 Neutron creates External ports for bare metal instances and uses ha_chassis_group. Neutron normally defines a different priority for Routers LRP gateway chassis and ha_chassis_group. I have a router with two VLANs attached - external (used for internet connectivity - SNAT or DNAT/Floating IP) and internal VLAN network hosting bare metal servers (and some Geneve networks for VMs). If an External port’s HA chassis group active chassis is different than gateway chassis (external vlan network) active chassis - those bare metal servers have intermittent network connectivity for any traffic going through that router. In a thread on ovs-discuss ML - Numan Siddique wrote that "it is recommended that the same controller which is actively handling the gateway traffic also handles the external ports" More information in this thread - https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs- discuss/2022-October/052067.html To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1995078/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
