S Moonesamy wrote:
Dear IESG,
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation was submitted for IESG
Evaluation on September 12, 2009. The issues raised by the IESG were
referred to the YAM WG on October 31, 2009 (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00147.html ). Ned
Freed posted some comments (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00149.html ) on
November 2, 2009 about RFC 1652 and they have been addressed in
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02 (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00267.html ).
I believe that RFC 1652 has been thoroughly reviewed for advancement
from Draft to Full Standard by the YAM WG. The results have been
communicated to the IESG in
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02. The draft was on the
agenda of the IESG for the January 14, 2010 telechat. The YAM WG
requests feedback from the IESG, in particular:
An official message from IESG should be coming any time now.
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
