Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
Feel free to suggest wording for an informational section
discouraging imaps/pop3s/smtps.
I would argue that since neither of imaps and pops are internet
standards, normative text about them is out of scope for a standards
track document, therefore all references to them should be deleted.
Standards-track document talk about such things quite often. As long as
it's informational, anything goes.
I grepped for (informational) references to experimental RFCs in RFCs
5000-present, and found several hundred.
993 is a nuisance, but it's real enough.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
