Folks,
(this concerns rfc1652bis)
On 1/25/2010 1:55 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 20/Jan/10 23:45, [email protected] wrote:
Title : SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport
Should section 2 mention that the extension is valid for both SMTP and
Submit? I haven't got that bit quite straight, yet...
Given that an extension like this declares its intended venue -- note "/SMTP/
Service Extension" I would guess that it should also declare other venues that
it is valid for. So yeah, it might be appropriate to have it declare that it's
for Submit, also.
But I'm not positive. I'm particularly concerned that there might be a subtle
issue here that I'm missing.
Comments?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
