Hi Roni,
Thank you for the review.
At 12:07 17-05-10, Roni Even wrote:
Summary: This draft is not meant to be published.
All I-Ds from the YAM WG with a "pre-evaluation" tag are not meant
for publication as a RFC. It would be helpful to the YAM WG if
future Gen-ART reviews also consider the Draft Standard that is being
evaluated as part of the review.
In general it looks good, what I did not see is a summary of an
analysis that evaluate if all commands and tags are used in
interoperable products
As an implementation report was previously filed for RFC 2821, there
is no need for a summary of an analysis of the interoperability of
the commands and tags.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG Secretary
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
