Dave,
If the proposal being promoted by Russ is chosen, then there's nothing for this wg to do: everything that is a candidate for the wg should automatically already be at the final level. No?
I would hope that the YAM working group exists to improve the e-mail related RFCs. I'm not sure about these specific RFCs, but in general, I at least see often small issues here and there, there's usually some filed errata, and we've learned over the years to understand some issues better. While all of these issues are small (as evidenced by global deployment of this technology), I still think they are worthwhile to handle. In short, while the edits will probably be small, I think it is our duty at the IETF to maintain our specifications.
For instance, I looked at draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation and all the suggested changes make sense to me (irrespective of what labels we might be using to name the resulting RFCs).
Just my view point on this, of course. Jari _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
