So I'd prefer noting that if a message is signed, the MSA
should consider what effect downcoding will have on the
validity of the signature, but not offer any advice about when
to do what.
That is pretty much where I was headed, but this seems like a
better way to make the statement. Want to suggest text and
where to put it?
Hmmn. On page 11, just before section 8.1:
If a incoming message includes a DKIM or other signature, sites SHOULD
consider what effect message modifications will have on the validity
of the signature, and MAY use the presence or absence of a signature
as a criterion when deciding what, if any, modifications to make.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
